DZS Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, DZS ranks #31,470 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 16 technology areas.
- #31,470
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 10%
- by Innovation Score (52.2/100)
- 17.5
- avg claims per patent
- +600%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31470 · US Corporation #31,470 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,470/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Dabney Patents L L C
- CPC-FOCUS H04W · 16 areas
- INNOV-PAR 52.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +600% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Dabney Patents, L.L.C. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How DZS’s 52.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around DZS
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- DZS · this assignee
DZS · this assignee
52 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows DZS's Innovation Score is 52.2/100 (top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for DZS?
Each dot is one of DZS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). DZS’s own 17.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where DZS's grants concentrate
DZS Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, DZS sits between Dymax Corporation and Danfoss Mobile Electrification Oy.
DZS's three-year grant acceleration
DZS Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at DZS's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Dymax
Dymax Corporation
8 patents
- Dynamic AIR
Dynamic AIR Inc
8 patents
- Dynamic Magnetics
Dynamic Magnetics, LLC
8 patents
- Dynepic Sports
Dynepic Sports, LLC
8 patents
- Dabney Patents L…
Dabney Patents, L.L.C.
8 patents
- Daio Engineering
Daio Engineering Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- Dakine IP Holdings
Dakine IP Holdings LP
8 patents
- Danfoss Mobile El…
Danfoss Mobile Electrification Oy
8 patents
- DZS ◀
DZS Inc.
8 patents
What this shows DZS holds 8 patents at rank #31,424, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near DZS
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,424 in granted patent volume.
- Dymax Corporation #31,420 · 8 patents
- Dynamic AIR Inc #31,421 · 8 patents
- Dynamic Magnetics, LLC #31,422 · 8 patents
- Dynepic Sports, LLC #31,423 · 8 patents
- Dabney Patents, L.L.C. #31,425 · 8 patents
- Daio Engineering Co., Ltd. #31,426 · 8 patents
- Dakine IP Holdings LP #31,427 · 8 patents
- Danfoss Mobile Electrification Oy #31,428 · 8 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in DZS's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
DZS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 10% higher than 90% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2024 | 3 | 37.5% |
Which technologies does DZS Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
DZS Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- DZS Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #31,470 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare DZS Inc. against Dymax Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 52.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.