Where does Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited ranks #31,469 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited hold?

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's Innovation Score?

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited has an Innovation Score of 38.9 out of 100 (top 40% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited.

What does claim depth mean for Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's patents?

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited

Q: What technology areas does Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited focus on?

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's top technology area is C06B (Explosives OR Thermic Compositions ; Manufacture THEREOF; USE OF Single Substances AS Explosives) with 6 patents, ranking #11 of 63 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C06B (Explosives OR Thermic Compositions ; Manufacture THEREOF; USE OF Single Substances AS Explosives).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Dyno ranks #31,469 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.

#31,469
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 40%
by Innovation Score (38.9/100): 18.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31469 · Foreign Corporation #31,469 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,469/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ductmate Industries
CPC-NARROW C06B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 38.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ductmate Industries, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Dyno’s 38.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (20%) Velocity 11.1 pts (29%) Breadth 9.4 pts (24%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Dyno Nobel Asia… · this assignee

39
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Dyno's Innovation Score is 38.9/100 (top 40% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dyno?

Each dot is one of Dyno’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dyno’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Dyno vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Dyno's grants concentrate

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under C06B (Explosives OR Thermic Compositions ; Manufacture THEREOF; USE OF Single Substances AS Explosives). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Dyno sits between Ductmate Industries, Inc. and E. I. Spectra, LLC.

Dyno's three-year grant acceleration

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Ductmate Industri…

8
Durham Enterprises

8
Dynavap

8
Dynisco Instrumen…

8
Dürr Ecoclean

8
E-motor USA

8
E-Z Bead

8
E I Spectra

8
Dyno Nobel Asia P… ◀

8

What this shows Dyno holds 8 patents at rank #31,470, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Dyno

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,470 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C06B (Explosives OR Thermic Compositions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dyno's primary technology class.

Dyno's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 40% higher than 60% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	25.0%
2021	1	12.5%
2024	5	62.5%

Which technologies does Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited patent most?

C06B - Explosives OR Thermic Compositions ; Manufacture THEREOF; USE OF Single Substances AS Explosives 6

F42D - Blasting 5

E21B - Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells 1

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 1

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 1

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 1

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited's lead technology class is C06B (Explosives OR Thermic Compositions ; Manufacture THEREOF; USE OF Single Substances AS Explosives), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C06B
Ranked #31,469 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited against Ductmate Industries, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 38.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.