Overall rank by patents
#24,215
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 17 technology areas, active 2018–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING).
The verdict
Divert holds 11 US patents across 17 technology areas, rank #24,215 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Divert, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Divert, Inc. at rank #24,215 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 17 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING). As a US Corporation, Divert, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Divert sits between Diggs Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,211) and Dongguan Mimao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (11 patents, rank #24,219) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 41.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 9 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +350% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Divert, Inc.'s 16.1 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 17 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Divert, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Diggs Inc.
11 patents
Digital Concepts of Missouri, Inc.
11 patents
Digital Fountain, Inc.
11 patents
Disruptive Technologies Research AS
11 patents
Dolby Laboratories Inc.
11 patents
Dolphin N2 Limited
11 patents
Domaille Engineering, LLC
11 patents
Dongguan Mimao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Divert, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Divert holds 11 patents at rank #24,215, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Divert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
41 Top 34% higher than 66% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2022 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2023 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2025 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,215
Across all tracked assignees
41.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Divert's 11 grants land it in the top 34% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.