Overall rank by patents
#24,211
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2022–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A01K (ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS).
The verdict
Diggs holds 11 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #24,211 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Diggs Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2022 and 2024, placing Diggs Inc. at rank #24,211 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 10.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A01K (ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS). As a US Corporation, Diggs Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Diggs sits between Diamond Productions Ltd. (11 patents, rank #24,207) and Divert, Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,215) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 41.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2022 through 2024, with 11 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Diggs Inc.'s 10.4 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Diggs Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Diamond Productions Ltd.
11 patents
Diehl Aircabin GmbH
11 patents
Diehl Aviation Laupheim GmbH
11 patents
Digerati, Inc.
11 patents
Digital Concepts of Missouri, Inc.
11 patents
Digital Fountain, Inc.
11 patents
Disruptive Technologies Research AS
11 patents
Divert, Inc.
11 patents
Diggs Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Diggs holds 11 patents at rank #24,211, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Diggs's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2024 | 6 | 54.5% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,211
Across all tracked assignees
41.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Diggs's 11 grants land it in the top 32% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.