Diebold, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Diebold ranks #13,947 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 19 technology areas.
- #13,947
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 44%
- by Innovation Score (37.4/100)
- 18.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13947 · US Corporation #13,947 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #13,947/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Data Systems
- CPC-FOCUS G07F · 19 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Data Systems Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Diebold’s 37.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Diebold
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Case-mate · near
Case-mate · near
37 score
- Cedes · near
Cedes · near
37 score
- Diebold · this assignee
Diebold · this assignee
37 score
- Opko Ireland Global… · near
Opko Ireland Global… · near
37 score
- VirnetX · near
VirnetX · near
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Diebold's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Diebold?
Each dot is one of Diebold’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Diebold’s own 18.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Diebold's grants concentrate
Diebold, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (12 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2017. By volume, Diebold sits between Data Systems Co., Ltd. and DSM Nutritional Products, LLC.
Who files at Diebold's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Data Systems
Data Systems Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Datometry
Datometry, Inc.
21 patents
- Dehn SE + KG
Dehn SE + Co KG
21 patents
- Dgshape
Dgshape Corporation
21 patents
- Dieterich Standard
Dieterich Standard, Inc.
21 patents
- Dmai
Dmai, Inc.
21 patents
- Dongguan Pinmi Te…
Dongguan Pinmi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- DSM Nutritional P…
DSM Nutritional Products, LLC
21 patents
- Diebold ◀
Diebold, Inc.
21 patents
What this shows Diebold holds 21 patents at rank #13,945, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Diebold
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,945 in granted patent volume.
- Data Systems Co., Ltd. #13,941 · 21 patents
- Datometry, Inc. #13,942 · 21 patents
- Dehn SE + Co KG #13,943 · 21 patents
- Dgshape Corporation #13,944 · 21 patents
- Dieterich Standard, Inc. #13,946 · 21 patents
- Dmai, Inc. #13,947 · 21 patents
- Dongguan Pinmi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. #13,948 · 21 patents
- DSM Nutritional Products, LLC #13,949 · 21 patents
Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Diebold's primary technology class.
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Diebold, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), Diebold ranks #113 of 1,075 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (37 here).
Diebold's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 12 | 57.1% |
| 2016 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2017 | 4 | 19.0% |
Which technologies does Diebold, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Diebold, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Diebold, Inc.'s lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
- Ranked #13,947 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Diebold, Inc. against Data Systems Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.