Overall rank by patents
#46,224
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B21D (WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL).
The verdict
Dayton holds 5 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #46,224 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Dayton Progress Corporation has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Dayton Progress Corporation at rank #46,224 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B21D (WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL). As a US Corporation, Dayton Progress Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Dayton sits between David B. Knight & Associates, Inc. (5 patents, rank #46,220) and Dewind One-pass Trenching, Llc (5 patents, rank #46,228) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 27.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Dayton Progress Corporation's 18.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Dayton Progress Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
David B. Knight & Associates, Inc.
5 patents
David R. Cordell & Associates, Inc.
5 patents
Davis Instruments Corporation
5 patents
Dawning Information Industry (Beijing) Co., Ltd
5 patents
De Staat der Nederlanden, vert. door de minister van VWS
5 patents
DeGroff Aviation Technologies
5 patents
DeNovix Inc.
5 patents
DeWind One-Pass Trenching, LLC
5 patents
Dayton Progress Corporation
5 patents
What this shows Dayton holds 5 patents at rank #46,224, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,224 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dayton's primary technology class.
Dayton's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 Top 75% higher than 25% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#46,224
Across all tracked assignees
27.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Dayton's 5 grants land it in the top 75% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.