Danone US, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Danone ranks #46,032 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #46,032
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 46%
- by Innovation Score (36.4/100)
- 6.8
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46032 · US Corporation #46,032 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,032/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Dajustco IP Holdings
- CPC-NARROW A23L · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Dajustco IP Holdings Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Danone’s 36.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Danone
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Danone US · this assignee
Danone US · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Danone's Innovation Score is 36.4/100 (top 46% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Danone?
Each dot is one of Danone’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Danone’s own 6.8 claims/patent is at or below the 16.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Danone's grants concentrate
Danone US, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof). By volume, Danone sits between Dajustco IP Holdings Inc. and Dasient, Inc..
Danone's three-year grant acceleration
Danone US, LLC shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Danone's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Dajustco IP Holdi…
Dajustco IP Holdings Inc.
5 patents
- Daktari Diagnosti…
Daktari Diagnostics, Inc.
5 patents
- Dallen Medical
Dallen Medical, Inc.
5 patents
- Daniel Paul Chairs
Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC
5 patents
- Dansko
Dansko, LLC
5 patents
- Danuser
Danuser LLC
5 patents
- Dasher Lawless
Dasher Lawless Technologies, LLC
5 patents
- Dasient
Dasient, Inc.
5 patents
- Danone US ◀
Danone US, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Danone holds 5 patents at rank #46,208, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Danone
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,208 in granted patent volume.
- Dajustco IP Holdings Inc. #46,204 · 5 patents
- Daktari Diagnostics, Inc. #46,205 · 5 patents
- Dallen Medical, Inc. #46,206 · 5 patents
- Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC #46,207 · 5 patents
- Dansko, LLC #46,209 · 5 patents
- Danuser LLC #46,210 · 5 patents
- Dasher Lawless Technologies, LLC #46,211 · 5 patents
- Dasient, Inc. #46,212 · 5 patents
Leaders in A23L (Foods)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Danone's primary technology class.
Danone's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 46% higher than 54% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Danone US, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Danone US, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Danone US, LLC's lead technology class is A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23L
- Ranked #46,032 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Danone US, LLC against Dajustco IP Holdings Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.