Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Daniel ranks #46,031 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #46,031
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 28th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.6/100)
- 16.0
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46031 · US Corporation #46,031 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,031/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Daily Instruments
- CPC-NARROW A47C · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Daily Instruments (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Daniel’s 28.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Daniel
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Daniel Paul Chairs · this assignee 29
Daniel Paul Chairs · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Daniel's Innovation Score is 28.6/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Daniel?
Each dot is one of Daniel’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Daniel’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Daniel's grants concentrate
Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Daniel sits between Daily Instruments and Dasher Lawless Technologies, LLC.
Daniel's three-year grant acceleration
Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Daniel's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Daily Instruments
Daily Instruments
5 patents
- Dajustco IP Holdi…
Dajustco IP Holdings Inc.
5 patents
- Daktari Diagnosti…
Daktari Diagnostics, Inc.
5 patents
- Dallen Medical
Dallen Medical, Inc.
5 patents
- Danone US
Danone US, LLC
5 patents
- Dansko
Dansko, LLC
5 patents
- Danuser
Danuser LLC
5 patents
- Dasher Lawless
Dasher Lawless Technologies, LLC
5 patents
- Daniel Paul Chairs ◀
Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Daniel holds 5 patents at rank #46,207, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Daniel
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,207 in granted patent volume.
- Daily Instruments #46,203 · 5 patents
- Dajustco IP Holdings Inc. #46,204 · 5 patents
- Daktari Diagnostics, Inc. #46,205 · 5 patents
- Dallen Medical, Inc. #46,206 · 5 patents
- Danone US, LLC #46,208 · 5 patents
- Dansko, LLC #46,209 · 5 patents
- Danuser LLC #46,210 · 5 patents
- Dasher Lawless Technologies, LLC #46,211 · 5 patents
Leaders in A47C (Chairs)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Daniel's primary technology class.
Daniel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC's lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
- Ranked #46,031 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Daniel Paul Chairs, LLC against Daily Instruments, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.