Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Daido ranks #15,942 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #15,942
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 36%
- by Innovation Score (40.2/100)
- 7.7
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R15942 · Foreign Corporation #15,942 · 18 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
- MID-PACK #15,942/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cyclazoom
- CPC-FOCUS F16H · 15 areas
- INNOV-PAR 40.2/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cyclazoom, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Daido’s 40.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Daido
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Daido Kogyo · this assignee
Daido Kogyo · this assignee
40 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Daido's Innovation Score is 40.2/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Daido?
Each dot is one of Daido’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Daido’s own 7.7 claims/patent is at or below the 8.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Daido's grants concentrate
Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 44.4% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Daido sits between Cyclazoom, LLC and Deepmotor Inc.
Daido's three-year grant acceleration
Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Daido's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cyclazoom
Cyclazoom, LLC
18 patents
- Cytiva US
Cytiva US LLC
18 patents
- Cytochip
CytoChip Inc.
18 patents
- Daher Aerospace
Daher Aerospace
18 patents
- Dakang Holding
Dakang Holding Co., Ltd.
18 patents
- DBV
DBV Technologies
18 patents
- DDK
DDK Ltd.
18 patents
- Deepmotor
Deepmotor Inc
18 patents
- Daido Kogyo ◀
Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd.
18 patents
What this shows Daido holds 18 patents at rank #15,941, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Daido
By rank, the assignees closest to #15,941 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F16H (Gearing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Daido's primary technology class.
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,326 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,070 in class
- ZF Friedrichshafen AG 904 in class
- Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG 820 in class
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 718 in class
- GM Global Technology Operations LLC 705 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 660 in class
- KIA Motors Corporation 571 in class
Daido's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2016 | 3 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.6% |
| 2020 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 5.6% |
| 2022 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 5 | 27.8% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 44.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
- Ranked #15,942 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd. against Cyclazoom, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 40.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.