Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Daicel ranks #39,741 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #39,741
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.1/100)
- 7.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39741 · Foreign Corporation #39,741 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,741/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Daewon Electric
- CPC-FOCUS B01J · 15 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Daewon Electric Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Daicel’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Daicel
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Daicel Chemical… · this assignee 25
Daicel Chemical… · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Daicel's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Daicel?
Each dot is one of Daicel’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Daicel’s own 7.8 claims/patent is at or below the 13.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Daicel's grants concentrate
Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Daicel sits between Daewon Electric Co., Ltd. and Danimer IPCo. LLC.
Who files at Daicel's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Daewon Electric
Daewon Electric Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Daewon Precision…
Daewon Precision Industrial Co., Ltd
6 patents
- DAH KEN Industrial
DAH KEN Industrial Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- DAH LIH PUH
DAH LIH PUH Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Dais Analytic
Dais Analytic Corporation
6 patents
- Damae Medical
Damae Medical
6 patents
- Dandelion Energy
Dandelion Energy, Inc.
6 patents
- Danimer Ipco
Danimer IPCo. LLC
6 patents
- Daicel Chemical I… ◀
Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Daicel holds 6 patents at rank #39,738, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Daicel
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,738 in granted patent volume.
- Daewon Electric Co., Ltd. #39,734 · 6 patents
- Daewon Precision Industrial Co., Ltd #39,735 · 6 patents
- DAH KEN Industrial Co., Ltd. #39,736 · 6 patents
- DAH LIH PUH Co., Ltd. #39,737 · 6 patents
- Dais Analytic Corporation #39,739 · 6 patents
- Damae Medical #39,740 · 6 patents
- Dandelion Energy, Inc. #39,741 · 6 patents
- Danimer IPCo. LLC #39,742 · 6 patents
Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Daicel's primary technology class.
Daicel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.'s lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
- Ranked #39,741 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. against Daewon Electric Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.