Cudoquanta Florida, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cudoquanta ranks #24,169 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #24,169
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 30th percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.1/100)
- 17.6
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24169 · US Corporation #24,169 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,169/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Caffeinate Labs
- CPC-NARROW G02B · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2021 · 2y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Caffeinate Labs Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cudoquanta’s 29.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cudoquanta
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cudoquanta Florida · this assignee 29
Cudoquanta Florida · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cudoquanta's Innovation Score is 29.1/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cudoquanta?
Each dot is one of Cudoquanta’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cudoquanta’s own 17.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cudoquanta's grants concentrate
Cudoquanta Florida, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (9 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Cudoquanta sits between CT Pack S.R.L. and Caffeinate Labs Inc..
Who files at Cudoquanta's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- CT Pack S R L
CT Pack S.R.L.
11 patents
- CTC Analytics
CTC Analytics AG
11 patents
- CTC BIO
CTC BIO, Inc.
11 patents
- CTF Solar
CTF Solar GmbH
11 patents
- Curbside
Curbside Inc.
11 patents
- CXL Ophthalmics
CXL Ophthalmics, LLC
11 patents
- Czech Technical U…
Czech Technical University IN Prague
11 patents
- Caffeinate Labs
Caffeinate Labs Inc.
11 patents
- Cudoquanta Florida ◀
Cudoquanta Florida, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Cudoquanta holds 11 patents at rank #24,100, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cudoquanta
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,100 in granted patent volume.
- CT Pack S.R.L. #24,096 · 11 patents
- CTC Analytics AG #24,097 · 11 patents
- CTC BIO, Inc. #24,098 · 11 patents
- CTF Solar GmbH #24,099 · 11 patents
- Curbside Inc. #24,101 · 11 patents
- CXL Ophthalmics, LLC #24,102 · 11 patents
- Czech Technical University IN Prague #24,103 · 11 patents
- Caffeinate Labs Inc. #24,104 · 11 patents
Leaders in G02B (Optical Elements)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cudoquanta's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,608 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 2,525 in class
- Fujifilm Corporation 2,173 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 1,899 in class
- Olympus Corporation 1,893 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,572 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,367 in class
- Seiko Epson Corporation 1,332 in class
Cudoquanta's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 9 | 81.8% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Cudoquanta Florida, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cudoquanta Florida, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cudoquanta Florida, Inc.'s lead technology class is G02B (Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G02B
- Ranked #24,169 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cudoquanta Florida, Inc. against CT Pack S.R.L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.