CSI Technologies LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, CSI ranks #39,691 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #39,691
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 24th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.6/100)
- 17.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39691 · US Corporation #39,691 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,691/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Crytur spol s r o
- CPC-NARROW E21B · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Crytur, spol. s r.o. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How CSI’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around CSI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- CSI · this assignee 28
CSI · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows CSI's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for CSI?
Each dot is one of CSI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CSI’s own 17.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where CSI's grants concentrate
CSI Technologies LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells). By volume, CSI sits between Crytur, spol. s r.o. and Cucchi Giovanni & C. S.R.L..
Who files at CSI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Crytur spol s r o
Crytur, spol. s r.o.
6 patents
- Csb-system
CSB-System AG
6 patents
- CSC Agility Platf…
CSC Agility Platform, Inc.
6 patents
- CSI Solar Power G…
CSI Solar Power Group Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Csignum
CSignum Ltd.
6 patents
- CT Energy
CT Energy Ltd.
6 patents
- Ct-concept
CT-Concept Technologie GmbH
6 patents
- Cucchi Giovanni &…
Cucchi Giovanni & C. S.R.L.
6 patents
- CSI ◀
CSI Technologies LLC
6 patents
What this shows CSI holds 6 patents at rank #39,470, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CSI
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,470 in granted patent volume.
- Crytur, spol. s r.o. #39,466 · 6 patents
- CSB-System AG #39,467 · 6 patents
- CSC Agility Platform, Inc. #39,468 · 6 patents
- CSI Solar Power Group Co., Ltd. #39,469 · 6 patents
- CSignum Ltd. #39,471 · 6 patents
- CT Energy Ltd. #39,472 · 6 patents
- CT-Concept Technologie GmbH #39,473 · 6 patents
- Cucchi Giovanni & C. S.R.L. #39,474 · 6 patents
Leaders in E21B (Earth OR Rock Drilling)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CSI's primary technology class.
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 6,516 in class
- Schlumberger Technology Corporation 3,244 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 3,064 in class
- Baker Hughes Holdings LLC 1,273 in class
- Baker Hughes, a GE company, LLC 1,107 in class
- Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC 829 in class
- Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC 598 in class
- Cameron International Corporation 514 in class
CSI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does CSI Technologies LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
CSI Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- CSI Technologies LLC's lead technology class is E21B (Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E21B
- Ranked #39,691 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare CSI Technologies LLC against Crytur, spol. s r.o., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.