Crucs Holdings, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Crucs ranks #39,675 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #39,675
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 36th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.9/100)
- 23.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39675 · US Corporation #39,675 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,675/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Creek Wearable…
- CPC-NARROW A63H · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.9/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 23.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Creek Wearable Technology Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Crucs’s 30.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Crucs
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Crucs Holdings · this assignee 31
Crucs Holdings · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Crucs's Innovation Score is 30.9/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crucs?
Each dot is one of Crucs’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crucs’s own 23.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Crucs's grants concentrate
Crucs Holdings, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Crucs sits between Creek Wearable Technology Co., Ltd. and Cryoshelter GmbH.
Who files at Crucs's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Creek Wearable Te…
Creek Wearable Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Cricket Media
Cricket Media, Inc.
6 patents
- Cristal Delivery…
Cristal Delivery B.V.
6 patents
- Crown Sterling
Crown Sterling Limited, LLC
6 patents
- Cruiser Products
Cruiser Products, LLC
6 patents
- Crusoe Energy Sys…
Crusoe Energy Systems LLC
6 patents
- Cruzar Medsystems
Cruzar Medsystems, Inc.
6 patents
- Cryoshelter
Cryoshelter GmbH
6 patents
- Crucs Holdings ◀
Crucs Holdings, LLC
6 patents
What this shows Crucs holds 6 patents at rank #39,694, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Crucs
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,694 in granted patent volume.
- Creek Wearable Technology Co., Ltd. #39,690 · 6 patents
- Cricket Media, Inc. #39,691 · 6 patents
- Cristal Delivery B.V. #39,692 · 6 patents
- Crown Sterling Limited, LLC #39,693 · 6 patents
- Cruiser Products, LLC #39,695 · 6 patents
- Crusoe Energy Systems LLC #39,696 · 6 patents
- Cruzar Medsystems, Inc. #39,697 · 6 patents
- Cryoshelter GmbH #39,698 · 6 patents
Leaders in A63H (Toys)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crucs's primary technology class.
Crucs's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Crucs Holdings, LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Crucs Holdings, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Crucs Holdings, LLC's lead technology class is A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63H
- Ranked #39,675 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Crucs Holdings, LLC against Creek Wearable Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.