Credit Karma, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2025–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Credit ranks #45,927 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #45,927
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 31st percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.6/100)
- 19.4
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45927 · US Corporation #45,927 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,927/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Craig Technical…
- CPC-FOCUS G06V · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2025–2025 · 1y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Craig Technical Consulting, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Credit’s 29.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Credit
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Credit Karma · this assignee 30
Credit Karma · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Credit's Innovation Score is 29.6/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Credit?
Each dot is one of Credit’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Credit’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Credit's grants concentrate
Credit Karma, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). By volume, Credit sits between Craig Technical Consulting, Inc. and Creedon Technologies HK Limited.
Who files at Credit's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Craig Technical C…
Craig Technical Consulting, Inc.
5 patents
- Crane Merchandisi…
Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.
5 patents
- Creative Balloons
Creative Balloons GmbH
5 patents
- Crediot
Crediot Inc.
5 patents
- Credit Sesame
Credit Sesame, Inc.
5 patents
- Credit Suisse Sec…
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
5 patents
- Cree Hong Kong
Cree Hong Kong Limited
5 patents
- Creedon HK
Creedon Technologies HK Limited
5 patents
- Credit Karma ◀
Credit Karma, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Credit holds 5 patents at rank #45,977, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Credit
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,977 in granted patent volume.
- Craig Technical Consulting, Inc. #45,973 · 5 patents
- Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. #45,974 · 5 patents
- Creative Balloons GmbH #45,975 · 5 patents
- Crediot Inc. #45,976 · 5 patents
- Credit Sesame, Inc. #45,978 · 5 patents
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC #45,979 · 5 patents
- Cree Hong Kong Limited #45,980 · 5 patents
- Creedon Technologies HK Limited #45,981 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Credit's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
Credit's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2025–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2025partial year | 5 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does Credit Karma, LLC patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Credit Karma, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Credit Karma, LLC's lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #45,927 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Credit Karma, LLC against Craig Technical Consulting, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.