PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cranial Technologies, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 19 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
23
Total patents granted
19
CPC technology areas
21.7
Avg claims per patent
+56%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Cranial holds 23 US patents across 19 technology areas, rank #12,865 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#12,865
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.1/100)
21.7
avg claims per patent
+56%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Cranial Technologies, Inc. has been granted 23 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Cranial Technologies, Inc. at rank #12,865 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 19 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE). As a US Corporation, Cranial Technologies, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cranial sits between Cobalt Robotics Inc. (23 patents, rank #12,861) and Cadwell Laboratories, Inc. (23 patents, rank #12,869) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 14 grants, compared with 9 in the 2015–2019 window, a +56% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s 21.7 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 19 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cranial Technologies, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Cranial's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cranial holds 23 patents at rank #12,865, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cranial

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,865 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable INTO Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cranial's primary technology class.

Cranial's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 20152017201820192020202220232025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cranial Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 8.7%
2017 4 17.4%
2018 1 4.3%
2019 2 8.7%
2020 7 30.4%
2022 1 4.3%
2023 4 17.4%
2025 2 8.7%

Which technologies does Cranial Technologies, Inc. patent most?

Top 15 of 19 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Complex
Velocity Accelerating

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#12,865

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

43.1 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Cranial Technologies, Inc. hold?
Cranial Technologies, Inc. holds 23 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 19 technology areas.
What is Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Cranial Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.1 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Cranial Technologies, Inc. focus on?
Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRS) with 19 patents. The company has filed patents in 19 CPC subclasses total.
Is Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is +56% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s patents?
Cranial Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 21.7 claims each. This indicates complex, broadly scoped patents that are harder for competitors to design around.
How is the Cranial Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Cranial's 23 grants land it in the top 29% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Cranial ranks #12,865 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61F - see who else leads that technology area. A61F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.