USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

CP Delaware, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, CP ranks #10,586 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 0 technology areas.

#10,586
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (12.3/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10586 · Foreign Corporation #10,586 · 29 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 29 grants
  • UPPER-Q #10,586/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Carma Technology
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 12.3/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Carma Technology Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How CP’s 12.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around CP

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows CP's Innovation Score is 12.3/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for CP?

Each dot is one of CP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CP’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

CP vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 28.92929.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cloud Network Technology Singapore PTE. Ltd. - 29, 14.55Cloud Network Tec…CMC Materials LLC - 29, 15.62CMC MaterialsCmech (GUANGZHOU) Ltd. - 29, 16.21Cmech (Guangzhou)Cordis Corporation - 29, 11.21CordisCSR Technology Holdings Inc. - 29, 21.83CSR Technology Ho…Carma Technology Ltd. - 29, 17.14Carma TechnologyCelgene Avilomics Research, Inc. - 29, 25.52Celgene Avilomics…Charles River Laboratories, Inc. - 29, 10.66Charles River Lab…CP Delaware, Inc. - 29, 1CP Delaware
CP vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where CP's grants concentrate

CP Delaware, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (16 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, CP sits between Cloud Network Technology Singapore PTE. Ltd. and Charles River Laboratories, Inc..

Who files at CP's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows CP holds 29 patents at rank #10,579, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near CP

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,579 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for CP, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (12 here).

CP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

12 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

05101520 2015201620172018 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
CP Delaware, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 11 37.9%
2016 16 55.2%
2017 1 3.4%
2018 1 3.4%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

CP Delaware, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #10,586 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare CP Delaware, Inc. against Cloud Network Technology Singapore PTE. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 12.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.