PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

No Longer Naked Lures, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 30 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, No ranks #10,410 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 30 patents across 0 technology areas.

#10,410
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (12.5/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10410 · US Corporation #10,410 · 30 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 30 grants
  • UPPER-Q #10,410/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH NeuMoDx Molecular
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 12.5/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: NeuMoDx Molecular, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How No’s 12.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around No

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows No's Innovation Score is 12.5/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for No?

Each dot is one of No’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). No’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

No vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 29.93030.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 30, 19.8Noven Pharmaceuti…Nucletron Operations B.V. - 30, 16.83Nucletron Operati…NeuMoDx Molecular, Inc. - 30, 17.87Neumodx MolecularNevis Industries LLC - 30, 14.3Nevis IndustriesNokian Heavy Tyres Ltd - 30, 1Nokian Heavy TyresNorth-West University - 30, 10.5North-west Univer…Numenta, Inc. - 30, 21.73NumentaOase GmbH - 30, 6.2OaseNo Longer Naked Lures, LLC - 30, 1No Longer Naked L…
No vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where No's grants concentrate

No Longer Naked Lures, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . By volume, No sits between Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Oase GmbH.

Who files at No's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows No holds 30 patents at rank #10,412, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near No

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,412 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for No, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (12 here).

Plant Introductions, Inc. 12 Fluke Electronics Corporation 12 Lifestyle Products, LLC 13 Ampla Group, Inc. 12

No's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

12 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
No Longer Naked Lures, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2019 30 100.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

No Longer Naked Lures, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #10,410 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare No Longer Naked Lures, LLC against Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 12.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.