Cortec, L.L.C.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cortec ranks #22,419 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #22,419
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 19%
- by Innovation Score (47.3/100)
- 19.0
- avg claims per patent
- -17%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22419 · US Corporation #22,419 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,419/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Condalign AS
- CPC-NARROW Y10T · 4 areas
- INNOV-PAR 47.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -17% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Condalign AS (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cortec’s 47.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cortec
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cortec L L C · this assignee
Cortec L L C · this assignee
47 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cortec's Innovation Score is 47.3/100 (top 19% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cortec?
Each dot is one of Cortec’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cortec’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cortec's grants concentrate
Cortec, L.L.C. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Cortec sits between Condalign AS and Cree Lighting USA LLC.
Cortec's three-year grant acceleration
Cortec, L.L.C. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cortec's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Condalign AS
Condalign AS
12 patents
- Cooktek Induction…
Cooktek Induction Systems LLC
12 patents
- Copeland Creative…
Copeland Creative Designs, LLC
12 patents
- Cormetrics
Cormetrics LLC
12 patents
- Coskata
Coskata, LLC
12 patents
- Costa Express
Costa Express Limited
12 patents
- Crage Medical
Crage Medical Co., Limited
12 patents
- Cree Lighting USA
Cree Lighting USA LLC
12 patents
- Cortec L L C ◀
Cortec, L.L.C.
12 patents
What this shows Cortec holds 12 patents at rank #22,372, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cortec
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,372 in granted patent volume.
- Condalign AS #22,368 · 12 patents
- Cooktek Induction Systems LLC #22,369 · 12 patents
- Copeland Creative Designs, LLC #22,370 · 12 patents
- Cormetrics LLC #22,371 · 12 patents
- Coskata, LLC #22,373 · 12 patents
- Costa Express Limited #22,374 · 12 patents
- Crage Medical Co., Limited #22,375 · 12 patents
- Cree Lighting USA LLC #22,376 · 12 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cortec's primary technology class.
Cortec's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does Cortec, L.L.C. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cortec, L.L.C.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cortec, L.L.C.'s lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #22,419 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cortec, L.L.C. against Condalign AS, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 47.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.