Cork Institute of Technology
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cork ranks #34,858 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #34,858
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.1/100)
- 22.6
- avg claims per patent
- -25%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34858 · Foreign Corporation #34,858 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #34,858/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Coolfire Solutions
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -25% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Coolfire Solutions, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cork’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cork
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cork Institute of… · this assignee 30
Cork Institute of… · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cork's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cork?
Each dot is one of Cork’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cork’s own 22.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cork's grants concentrate
Cork Institute of Technology is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Cork sits between CoolSystems, Inc. and Cotton Incorporated.
Who files at Cork's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Coolsystems
CoolSystems, Inc.
7 patents
- Coolfire Solutions
Coolfire Solutions, Inc.
7 patents
- Copper Labs
Copper Labs, Inc.
7 patents
- Cormedix
CorMedix Inc.
7 patents
- Cormove
Cormove
7 patents
- Corsam
Corsam Technologies LLC
7 patents
- Cosma Engineering…
Cosma Engineering Europe GmbH
7 patents
- Cotton Incorporat…
Cotton Incorporated
7 patents
- Cork Institute of… ◀
Cork Institute of Technology
7 patents
What this shows Cork holds 7 patents at rank #34,890, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cork
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,890 in granted patent volume.
- CoolSystems, Inc. #34,886 · 7 patents
- Coolfire Solutions, Inc. #34,887 · 7 patents
- Copper Labs, Inc. #34,888 · 7 patents
- CorMedix Inc. #34,889 · 7 patents
- Cormove #34,891 · 7 patents
- Corsam Technologies LLC #34,892 · 7 patents
- Cosma Engineering Europe GmbH #34,893 · 7 patents
- Cotton Incorporated #34,894 · 7 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cork's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Cork's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 3 | 42.9% |
Which technologies does Cork Institute of Technology patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cork Institute of Technology's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cork Institute of Technology's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #34,858 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cork Institute of Technology against CoolSystems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.