USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Concurrent Ventures

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Concurrent ranks #12,877 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 4 technology areas.

#12,877
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.7/100)
17.8
avg claims per patent
-72%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12877 · US Corporation #12,877 · 23 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
  • MID-PACK #12,877/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Clariphy Communicati…
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 28.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -72% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Clariphy Communications, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Concurrent’s 28.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Concurrent

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Concurrent's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concurrent?

Each dot is one of Concurrent’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concurrent’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Concurrent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 22.922.92323.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Clariphy Communications, Inc. - 23, 22.17Clariphy Communic…CoPilot Ventures Fund III LLC - 23, 19.74Copilot Ventures…Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG - 23, 17.65Coherent Lasersys…Compurobot Technology Company - 23, 8.04Compurobot Techno…Core Intellectual Properties Holdings, LLC - 23, 15.3Core Intellectual…Cornerstone CM, Inc. - 23, 8.17Cornerstone CMCoöperatie Avebe U.A. - 23, 15.26öperatie Avebe U ACreator Technology B.V. - 23, 15.17Creator Technolog…Concurrent Ventures - 23, 17.78Concurrent Ventur…
Concurrent vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Concurrent's grants concentrate

Concurrent Ventures is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 78.3% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Concurrent sits between Clariphy Communications, Inc. and Creator Technology B.V..

Who files at Concurrent's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Concurrent holds 23 patents at rank #12,881, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Concurrent

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,881 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concurrent's primary technology class.

Concurrent's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172018201920202021 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Concurrent Ventures patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 7 30.4%
2016 3 13.0%
2017 3 13.0%
2018 3 13.0%
2019 2 8.7%
2020 3 13.0%
2021 2 8.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Concurrent Ventures's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Concurrent Ventures's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 78.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #12,877 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Concurrent Ventures against Clariphy Communications, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.