Clariphy Communications, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Clariphy ranks #12,870 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #12,870
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.6/100)
- 22.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12870 · US Corporation #12,870 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #12,870/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Chemische Fabrik…
- CPC-NARROW H04B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Clariphy’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clariphy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Clariphy Communicati… · this assignee 34
Clariphy Communicati… · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Clariphy's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clariphy?
Each dot is one of Clariphy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clariphy’s own 22.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Clariphy's grants concentrate
Clariphy Communications, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 82.6% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (10 grants) versus a trough of 4 in 2017. By volume, Clariphy sits between Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG and Concurrent Ventures.
Who files at Clariphy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Chemische Fabrik…
Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
23 patents
- Cheng Shin Rubber…
Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind. Ltd.
23 patents
- Chromera
Chromera, Inc.
23 patents
- Clarapath
Clarapath, Inc.
23 patents
- Copilot Ventures…
CoPilot Ventures Fund III LLC
23 patents
- Coherent Lasersys…
Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG
23 patents
- Compurobot Techno…
Compurobot Technology Company
23 patents
- Concurrent Ventur…
Concurrent Ventures
23 patents
- Clariphy Communic… ◀
Clariphy Communications, Inc.
23 patents
What this shows Clariphy holds 23 patents at rank #12,877, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Clariphy
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,877 in granted patent volume.
- Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG #12,873 · 23 patents
- Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind. Ltd. #12,874 · 23 patents
- Chromera, Inc. #12,875 · 23 patents
- Clarapath, Inc. #12,876 · 23 patents
- CoPilot Ventures Fund III LLC #12,878 · 23 patents
- Coherent LaserSystems GmbH & Co. KG #12,879 · 23 patents
- Compurobot Technology Company #12,880 · 23 patents
- Concurrent Ventures #12,881 · 23 patents
Leaders in H04B (Transmission)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clariphy's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 6,670 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,632 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 3,654 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 3,555 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 3,146 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,286 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,705 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,475 in class
Clariphy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 9 | 39.1% |
| 2016 | 10 | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 4 | 17.4% |
Which technologies does Clariphy Communications, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Clariphy Communications, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Clariphy Communications, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 82.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
- Ranked #12,870 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Clariphy Communications, Inc. against Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.