Overall rank by patents
#34,827
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Concept ranks #34,827 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R34827 · US Corporation #34,827 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Comnav Technology Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Concept Workshop… · this assignee
26 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Concept's Innovation Score is 25.8/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Concept Workshop Worldwide, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Concept sits between Comnav Technology Ltd. and Coolcold Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd..
Concept Workshop Worldwide, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Comnav Technology Ltd.
7 patents
Compagnie Engrenages ET Reducteurs-messian-durand
7 patents
Conaris Research Institute AG
7 patents
Concentric Analgesics, Inc.
7 patents
Concio Holdings LLC
7 patents
Conquer Electronics Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Constantia Pirk GMBH & Co. KG
7 patents
Coolcold Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd.
7 patents
Concept Workshop Worldwide, LLC
7 patents
What this shows Concept holds 7 patents at rank #34,715, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,715 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concept's primary technology class.
Concept's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#34,827
of 49,997 tracked assignees
25.8 out of 100
What to do with this data
Concept Workshop Worldwide, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.