Overall rank by patents
#4,112
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 87 granted patents across 21 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS).
The verdict
Cognitive holds 87 US patents across 21 technology areas, rank #4,112 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cognitive Systems Corp. has been granted 87 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Cognitive Systems Corp. at rank #4,112 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 24.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS). As a Foreign Corporation, Cognitive Systems Corp. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cognitive sits between Board Of Trustees Of The Univeristy Of Alabama, For And On Behalf Of The University Of Alabama In Huntsville (87 patents, rank #4,108) and F-secure Corporation (87 patents, rank #4,116) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 51.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 48 grants, compared with 39 in the 2015–2019 window, a +23% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cognitive Systems Corp.'s 24.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 21 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cognitive Systems Corp. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Board of Trustees of the Univeristy of Alabama, for and on behalf of the University of Alabama in Huntsville
87 patents
CELLECTIS
87 patents
CHANEL PARFUMS BEAUTE
87 patents
COMPAGNIE PLASTIC OMNIUM SE
87 patents
D2L Corporation
87 patents
DARAMIC, LLC
87 patents
DUMMEN GROUP B.V.
87 patents
F-Secure Corporation
87 patents
Cognitive Systems Corp.
87 patents
What this shows Cognitive holds 87 patents at rank #4,112, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,112 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cognitive's primary technology class.
Cognitive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
52 Top 11% higher than 89% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 2.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 4.6% |
| 2017 | 7 | 8.0% |
| 2018 | 13 | 14.9% |
| 2019 | 13 | 14.9% |
| 2020 | 9 | 10.3% |
| 2021 | 10 | 11.5% |
| 2022 | 3 | 3.4% |
| 2023 | 9 | 10.3% |
| 2024 | 14 | 16.1% |
| 2025 | 3 | 3.4% |
Top 15 of 21 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,112
Across all tracked assignees
51.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cognitive's 87 grants land it in the top 11% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.