Where does Code Systems Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Code Systems Corporation ranks #9,008 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Code Systems Corporation hold?

Code Systems Corporation holds 35 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Code Systems Corporation's Innovation Score?

Code Systems Corporation has an Innovation Score of 30.2 out of 100 (34th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Code Systems Corporation focus on?

Code Systems Corporation's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 30 patents, ranking #1,478 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Code Systems Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Code Systems Corporation's recent grant velocity is -94% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Code Systems Corporation's patents?

Code Systems Corporation's patents average 17.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Code Systems Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Code Systems Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 35 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Code ranks #9,008 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 35 patents across 2 technology areas.

#9,008
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 34th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.2/100): 17.7
avg claims per patent: -94%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9008 · US Corporation #9,008 · 35 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 35 grants
UPPER-Q #9,008/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Carlsmed
CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -94% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Carlsmed, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Code’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.4 pts (41%) Velocity 2.2 pts (7%) Breadth 5.0 pts (17%) Claim depth 10.6 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Citizen Systems Japan · near

30
Code Systems · this assignee

30
ColorTokens · near

30
Leister · near

30
Mobotix · near

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Code's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Code?

Each dot is one of Code’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Code’s own 17.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Code vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Code's grants concentrate

Code Systems Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Code sits between China Electric Power Research Institute and China Energy Investment Corporation Limited.

Code's three-year grant acceleration

Code Systems Corporation shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

China Electric Po…

35
Cixi Huazhijie Pl…

35
CJ CGV

35
Cnrs-centre Natio…

35
Corvia Medical

35
Carlsmed

35
Children's Hospit…

35
China Energy Inve…

35
Code Systems ◀

35

What this shows Code holds 35 patents at rank #9,002, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Code

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,002 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Code's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Code, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Code ranks #1,478 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (30 here).

ColorTokens Inc. 30 Leister Technologies AG 30 Mobotix AG 30 Citizen Systems Japan Co., Ltd. 30

Code's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Code Systems Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	14	40.0%
2016	3	8.6%
2017	8	22.9%
2018	6	17.1%
2019	2	5.7%
2021	1	2.9%
2022	1	2.9%

Which technologies does Code Systems Corporation patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 30

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 19

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Code Systems Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Code Systems Corporation's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #9,008 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Code Systems Corporation against China Electric Power Research Institute, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.