USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

C.M.C. S.p.A.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, C.m.c. ranks #28,446 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 7 technology areas.

#28,446
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.1/100)
9.7
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28446 · Foreign Corporation #28,446 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #28,446/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Bunge Global…
  • CPC-NARROW B65B · 7 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 43.1/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 9.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bunge Global Innovation, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How C.m.c.’s 43.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around C.m.c.

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows C.m.c.'s Innovation Score is 43.1/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for C.m.c.?

Each dot is one of C.m.c.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). C.m.c.’s own 9.7 claims/patent is at or below the 20.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

C.m.c. vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 01020304050 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Bunge Global Innovation, LLC - 9, 20.11Bunge Global Inno…Burley Design LLC - 9, 23.33Burley DesignBurlywood, Inc. - 9, 20BurlywoodBury Sp.z.o.o. - 9, 11.33Bury Sp z o oC2Sense, Inc. - 9, 20.78C2senseC3 Corporation - 9, 41.11C3Calyxia - 9, 13.78CalyxiaCambridge Glycoscience Ltd - 9, 21.67Cambridge Glycosc…C.M.C. S.p.A. - 9, 9.67C M C S p A
C.m.c. vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where C.m.c.'s grants concentrate

C.M.C. S.p.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, C.m.c. sits between Bunge Global Innovation, LLC and Cambridge Glycoscience Ltd.

C.m.c.'s three-year grant acceleration

C.M.C. S.p.A. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at CMC's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows C.M.C. holds 9 patents at rank #28,317, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near CMC

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,317 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B65B (Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CMC's primary technology class.

C.m.c.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.544.5 202320242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2023–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
C.M.C. S.p.A. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2023 3 33.3%
2024 2 22.2%
2025partial year 4 44.4%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

C.M.C. S.p.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • C.M.C. S.p.A.'s lead technology class is B65B (Machines, Apparatus OR Devices FOR, OR Methods OF, Packaging Articles OR MATERIALS; Unpacking), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65B
  • Ranked #28,446 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare C.M.C. S.p.A. against Bunge Global Innovation, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.