Clutterbot, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G05D (Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Clutterbot ranks #28,445 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #28,445
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 42%
- by Innovation Score (37.8/100)
- 4.7
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28445 · US Corporation #28,445 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,445/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cleveland Heartlab
- CPC-NARROW G05D · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cleveland Heartlab, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Clutterbot’s 37.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clutterbot
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Clutterbot · this assignee
Clutterbot · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Clutterbot's Innovation Score is 37.8/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clutterbot?
Each dot is one of Clutterbot’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clutterbot’s own 4.7 claims/patent is at or below the 14.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Clutterbot's grants concentrate
Clutterbot, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 22.2% of grants classified under G05D (Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2024. By volume, Clutterbot sits between Cleveland Heartlab, Inc. and Coilcraft, Incorporated.
Clutterbot's three-year grant acceleration
Clutterbot, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Clutterbot's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cleveland Heartlab
Cleveland Heartlab, Inc.
9 patents
- Climateai
ClimateAI, Inc.
9 patents
- Cloud Microphones
Cloud Microphones, LLC.
9 patents
- Cloudnav
CloudNav Inc.
9 patents
- Cogentix Medical
Cogentix Medical, Inc.
9 patents
- Cognex Technology…
Cognex Technology and Investment LLC
9 patents
- Cognism
Cognism Limited
9 patents
- Coilcraft Incorpo…
Coilcraft, Incorporated
9 patents
- Clutterbot ◀
Clutterbot, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Clutterbot holds 9 patents at rank #28,476, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Clutterbot
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,476 in granted patent volume.
- Cleveland Heartlab, Inc. #28,472 · 9 patents
- ClimateAI, Inc. #28,473 · 9 patents
- Cloud Microphones, LLC. #28,474 · 9 patents
- CloudNav Inc. #28,475 · 9 patents
- Cogentix Medical, Inc. #28,477 · 9 patents
- Cognex Technology and Investment LLC #28,478 · 9 patents
- Cognism Limited #28,479 · 9 patents
- Coilcraft, Incorporated #28,480 · 9 patents
Leaders in G05D (Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clutterbot's primary technology class.
Clutterbot's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 44.4% |
Which technologies does Clutterbot, Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Clutterbot, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Clutterbot, Inc.'s lead technology class is G05D (Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables), 22.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G05D
- Ranked #28,445 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Clutterbot, Inc. against Cleveland Heartlab, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.