Overall rank by patents
#39,383
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01L (MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE).
The verdict
Cleveland holds 6 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #39,383 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cleveland Electric Laboratories has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing Cleveland Electric Laboratories at rank #39,383 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01L (MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE). As a US Corporation, Cleveland Electric Laboratories is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cleveland sits between CL Schutzrechtsverwaltungs Gmbh (6 patents, rank #39,379) and Cloudbrink Inc. (6 patents, rank #39,387) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -80% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cleveland Electric Laboratories's 12.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cleveland Electric Laboratories against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CL SCHUTZRECHTSVERWALTUNGS GMBH
6 patents
CLEAN WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
6 patents
CLEANR INC.
6 patents
CLEANSPACE IP PTY LTD
6 patents
CLEXTRAL
6 patents
CLICKSOFTWARE, INC.
6 patents
CLIPr Co.
6 patents
CLOUDBRINK INC.
6 patents
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC LABORATORIES
6 patents
What this shows Cleveland holds 6 patents at rank #39,383, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,383 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cleveland's primary technology class.
Cleveland's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 61% higher than 39% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,383
Across all tracked assignees
31.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cleveland's 6 grants land it in the top 61% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.