Clean Concept LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F21Y (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Clean ranks #39,480 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #39,480
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.8/100)
- 8.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39480 · US Corporation #39,480 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,480/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Civan Advanced
- CPC-NARROW F21Y · 4 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.8/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Clean’s 18.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clean
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Clean Concept · this assignee 19
Clean Concept · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Clean's Innovation Score is 18.8/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clean?
Each dot is one of Clean’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clean’s own 8.3 claims/patent is at or below the 9.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Clean's grants concentrate
Clean Concept LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under F21Y (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Clean sits between Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd. and ClearFlame Engines, Inc..
Who files at Clean's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Civan Advanced
Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd.
6 patents
- Civil Aviation Fl…
Civil Aviation Flight University of China
6 patents
- Clamp Swing Prici…
Clamp Swing Pricing Company
6 patents
- Clarins Fragrance…
Clarins Fragrance Group
6 patents
- Cleana
Cleana Inc.
6 patents
- Clear IP
Clear IP Corporation
6 patents
- Clearcube Technol…
ClearCube Technology, Inc.
6 patents
- Clearflame Engines
ClearFlame Engines, Inc.
6 patents
- Clean Concept ◀
Clean Concept LLC
6 patents
What this shows Clean holds 6 patents at rank #39,583, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Clean
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,583 in granted patent volume.
- Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd. #39,579 · 6 patents
- Civil Aviation Flight University of China #39,580 · 6 patents
- Clamp Swing Pricing Company #39,581 · 6 patents
- Clarins Fragrance Group #39,582 · 6 patents
- Cleana Inc. #39,584 · 6 patents
- Clear IP Corporation #39,585 · 6 patents
- ClearCube Technology, Inc. #39,586 · 6 patents
- ClearFlame Engines, Inc. #39,587 · 6 patents
Leaders in F21Y (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clean's primary technology class.
Clean's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Clean Concept LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Clean Concept LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Clean Concept LLC's lead technology class is F21Y (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO THE Form OR THE Kind OF THE Light Sources OR OF THE Colour OF THE Light Emitted), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F21Y
- Ranked #39,480 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Clean Concept LLC against Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.