Clamp Swing Pricing Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Clamp ranks #39,478 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #39,478
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (12.8/100)
- 4.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39478 · US Corporation #39,478 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,478/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cirrus Outdoors
- CPC-NARROW G09F · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 12.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cirrus Outdoors, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Clamp’s 12.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clamp
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Clamp Swing Pricing · this assignee 13
Clamp Swing Pricing · this assignee
13 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Clamp's Innovation Score is 12.8/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clamp?
Each dot is one of Clamp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clamp’s own 4.2 claims/patent is at or below the 8.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Clamp's grants concentrate
Clamp Swing Pricing Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Clamp sits between Cirrus Outdoors, LLC and Clear IP Corporation.
Who files at Clamp's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cirrus Outdoors
Cirrus Outdoors, LLC
6 patents
- Citadel Casing
Citadel Casing Ltd
6 patents
- Civan Advanced
Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd.
6 patents
- Civil Aviation Fl…
Civil Aviation Flight University of China
6 patents
- Clarins Fragrance…
Clarins Fragrance Group
6 patents
- Clean Concept
Clean Concept LLC
6 patents
- Cleana
Cleana Inc.
6 patents
- Clear IP
Clear IP Corporation
6 patents
- Clamp Swing Prici… ◀
Clamp Swing Pricing Company
6 patents
What this shows Clamp holds 6 patents at rank #39,581, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Clamp
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,581 in granted patent volume.
- Cirrus Outdoors, LLC #39,577 · 6 patents
- Citadel Casing Ltd #39,578 · 6 patents
- Civan Advanced Technologies Ltd. #39,579 · 6 patents
- Civil Aviation Flight University of China #39,580 · 6 patents
- Clarins Fragrance Group #39,582 · 6 patents
- Clean Concept LLC #39,583 · 6 patents
- Cleana Inc. #39,584 · 6 patents
- Clear IP Corporation #39,585 · 6 patents
Leaders in G09F (Displaying)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clamp's primary technology class.
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 621 in class
- Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha 467 in class
- Japan Display Inc. 305 in class
- LG Display Co., Ltd. 268 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 249 in class
- Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. 183 in class
- Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 152 in class
- Sakai Display Products Corporation 97 in class
Clamp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Clamp Swing Pricing Company patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Clamp Swing Pricing Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Clamp Swing Pricing Company's lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
- Ranked #39,478 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Clamp Swing Pricing Company against Cirrus Outdoors, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 12.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.