USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Classiq Technologies Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS).

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Classiq ranks #13,923 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 3 technology areas.

#13,923
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 16%
by Innovation Score (49.0/100)
20.3
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13923 · Foreign Corporation #13,923 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
  • MID-PACK #13,923/50,000
  • PHOTO-FINISH ChengDu HaiCun IP Te…
  • CPC-NARROW G06N · 3 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 49.0/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 20.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Chengdu Haicun IP Technology Llc (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Classiq

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Classiq Technologies Ltd. stamps GRANTS-SMALL, MID-PACK, PHOTO-FINISH, CPC-NARROW, INNOV-PAR, CLAIMS-DENSE, TYPE-FRNCORP, SPAN-YRS, BOOK-RICH. Volume places it #13,923 of 50,000; Innovation Score 49.0/100 sits in the top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus. Closest grant-volume peer on this plate is Chengdu Haicun IP Technology Llc (±0 grants).

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Portfolio overview

Classiq Technologies Ltd. has been granted 21 US utility patents between 2022 and 2025, placing Classiq Technologies Ltd. at #13,923 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 3 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS). As a Foreign Corporation, Classiq Technologies Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Classiq sits between Chengdu Haicun IP Technology Llc (21 patents, rank #13,924) and Cornell Pump Company Llc (21 patents, rank #13,932) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 49.0/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2022 through 2025, with 21 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Classiq Technologies Ltd.'s 20.3 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 3 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Classiq's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Classiq holds 21 patents at rank #13,928, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Classiq

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,928 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Classiq's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Classiq, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Classiq's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

2345678 2022202320242025 5
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Classiq Technologies Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 6 28.6%
2023 3 14.3%
2024 7 33.3%
2025partial year 5 23.8%

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#13,923

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

49.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.