USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Clairvoyant Technology, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Clairvoyant ranks #19,606 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 10 technology areas.

#19,606
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
44th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.4/100)
19.6
avg claims per patent
-50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19606 · US Corporation #19,606 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,606/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Chicago Tag & Label
  • CPC-FOCUS H04B · 10 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.4/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 19.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -50% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Chicago Tag & Label, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Clairvoyant’s 33.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clairvoyant

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Clairvoyant's Innovation Score is 33.4/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clairvoyant?

Each dot is one of Clairvoyant’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clairvoyant’s own 19.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Clairvoyant vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Chicago Tag & Label, Inc. - 14, 16.93Chicago Tag & Lab…Children Oral Care, LLC - 14, 5.93Children Oral CareChina Banknote Printing and Minting Corp. - 14, 17.43China Banknote Pr…Chuango Security Technology Corporation - 14, 1Chuango Security…Clarity, Inc. - 14, 2.86ClarityCllag GmbH International - 14, 24.21Cllag Internation…CloudGenix, Inc. - 14, 15.93CloudgenixCode 3, Inc. - 14, 12.79Code 3Clairvoyant Technology, Inc. - 14, 19.64Clairvoyant Techn…
Clairvoyant vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Clairvoyant's grants concentrate

Clairvoyant Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 78.6% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Clairvoyant sits between Chicago Tag & Label, Inc. and Code 3, Inc..

Clairvoyant's three-year grant acceleration

Clairvoyant Technology, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Clairvoyant's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Clairvoyant holds 14 patents at rank #19,624, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Clairvoyant

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,624 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04B (Transmission)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clairvoyant's primary technology class.

Clairvoyant's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20152016201720192020202120222025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Clairvoyant Technology, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 7.1%
2016 2 14.3%
2017 2 14.3%
2019 3 21.4%
2020 2 14.3%
2021 1 7.1%
2022 1 7.1%
2025partial year 2 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Clairvoyant Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Clairvoyant Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 78.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
  • Ranked #19,606 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Clairvoyant Technology, Inc. against Chicago Tag & Label, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.