Where does Citifyd, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Citifyd, Inc. ranks #39,474 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Citifyd, Inc. hold?

Citifyd, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Citifyd, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Citifyd, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 29.7 out of 100 (31st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Citifyd, Inc. focus on?

Citifyd, Inc.'s top technology area is G07B (Ticket-issuing APPARATUS; Fare-registering APPARATUS; Franking Apparatus) with 6 patents, ranking #39 of 153 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Citifyd, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Citifyd, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Citifyd, Inc.'s patents?

Citifyd, Inc.'s patents average 16.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Citifyd, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Citifyd, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07B (Ticket-issuing APPARATUS; Fare-registering APPARATUS; Franking Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Citifyd ranks #39,474 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.

#39,474
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 31st percentile
by Innovation Score (29.7/100): 16.0
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39474 · US Corporation #39,474 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,474/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cifralluminio S R L
CPC-NARROW G07B · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cifralluminio S.R.L (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Citifyd’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (23%) Velocity 3.3 pts (11%) Breadth 10.0 pts (34%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Citifyd · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Citifyd's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Citifyd?

Each dot is one of Citifyd’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Citifyd’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Citifyd vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Citifyd's grants concentrate

Citifyd, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G07B (Ticket-issuing APPARATUS; Fare-registering APPARATUS; Franking Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Citifyd sits between Cifralluminio S.R.L and Cleanspace IP PTY Ltd.

Citifyd's three-year grant acceleration

Citifyd, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Cifralluminio S R…

6
Cigent Technology

6
Cipherlab

6
Cirel Systems Pri…

6
CL Schutzrechtsve…

6
Clean Wave

6
Cleanr

6
Cleanspace IP PTY

6
Citifyd ◀

6

What this shows Citifyd holds 6 patents at rank #39,378, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Citifyd

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,378 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G07B (Ticket-issuing Apparatus)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Citifyd's primary technology class.

Citifyd's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Citifyd, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	16.7%
2020	1	16.7%
2021	2	33.3%
2022	1	16.7%
2024	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Citifyd, Inc. patent most?

G07B - Ticket-issuing APPARATUS; Fare-registering APPARATUS; Franking Apparatus 6

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 5

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

G08G - Traffic Control Systems 4

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 2

G07C - Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Citifyd, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Citifyd, Inc.'s lead technology class is G07B (Ticket-issuing APPARATUS; Fare-registering APPARATUS; Franking Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07B
Ranked #39,474 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Citifyd, Inc. against Cifralluminio S.R.L, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.