Cinch Systems, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08G (Traffic Control Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cinch ranks #31,210 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #31,210
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 7th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.4/100)
- 9.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31210 · US Corporation #31,210 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,210/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Chicago Stock Exchange
- CPC-NARROW G08G · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cinch’s 20.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cinch
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cinch Systems · this assignee 20
Cinch Systems · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cinch's Innovation Score is 20.4/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cinch?
Each dot is one of Cinch’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cinch’s own 9.5 claims/patent is at or below the 19.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cinch's grants concentrate
Cinch Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under G08G (Traffic Control Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Cinch sits between Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. and Civiq Smartscapes, LLC.
Who files at Cinch's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Chicago Stock Exc…
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
8 patents
- China Academy of…
China Academy of Art
8 patents
- Chinook Therapeut…
Chinook Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Christopher Cox C…
Christopher Cox Creative
8 patents
- Cipher Skin
Cipher Skin
8 patents
- Cisco Systems
Cisco Systems Inc.
8 patents
- Citigroup
Citigroup Inc.
8 patents
- Civiq Smartscapes
Civiq Smartscapes, LLC
8 patents
- Cinch Systems ◀
Cinch Systems, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Cinch holds 8 patents at rank #31,283, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cinch
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,283 in granted patent volume.
- Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. #31,279 · 8 patents
- China Academy of Art #31,280 · 8 patents
- Chinook Therapeutics, Inc. #31,281 · 8 patents
- Christopher Cox Creative #31,282 · 8 patents
- Cipher Skin #31,284 · 8 patents
- Cisco Systems Inc. #31,285 · 8 patents
- Citigroup Inc. #31,286 · 8 patents
- Civiq Smartscapes, LLC #31,287 · 8 patents
Leaders in G08G (Traffic Control Systems)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cinch's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,228 in class
- Denso Corporation 767 in class
- Honeywell International Inc. 709 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 570 in class
- Here Global B.V. 481 in class
- The Boeing Company 464 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 447 in class
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 447 in class
Cinch's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2017 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Cinch Systems, Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cinch Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cinch Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is G08G (Traffic Control Systems), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08G
- Ranked #31,210 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cinch Systems, Inc. against Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.