Chrysanthemum Breeders Association Research B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Chrysanthemum ranks #11,211 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #11,211
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (12.1/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R11211 · Foreign Corporation #11,211 · 27 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
- UPPER-Q #11,211/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cequent Performance…
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 12.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cequent Performance Products, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Chrysanthemum’s 12.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Chrysanthemum
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Chrysanthemum… · this assignee 12
Chrysanthemum… · this assignee
12 score
- Ronbow · near 12
Ronbow · near
12 score
- Top Knobs USA · near 12
Top Knobs USA · near
12 score
- Mitre Sports… · near 12
Mitre Sports… · near
12 score
- MJB Wood Group · near 12
MJB Wood Group · near
12 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Chrysanthemum's Innovation Score is 12.1/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chrysanthemum?
Each dot is one of Chrysanthemum’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chrysanthemum’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Chrysanthemum's grants concentrate
Chrysanthemum Breeders Association Research B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2016 (11 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2015. By volume, Chrysanthemum sits between Cequent Performance Products, Inc. and ClearMotion Acquisition I LLC.
Who files at Chrysanthemum's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cequent Performan…
Cequent Performance Products, Inc.
27 patents
- Charm Sciences
Charm Sciences, Inc.
27 patents
- China Wafer Level…
China Wafer Level CSP Co., Ltd.
27 patents
- Chromatic
Chromatic Inc.
27 patents
- Chunghwa Telecom
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
27 patents
- Clariant
Clariant Corporation
27 patents
- Clarios Advanced…
Clarios Advanced Solutions GmbH
27 patents
- Clearmotion Acqui…
ClearMotion Acquisition I LLC
27 patents
- Chrysanthemum Bre… ◀
Chrysanthemum Breeders Association Research B.V.
27 patents
What this shows Chrysanthemum holds 27 patents at rank #11,216, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Chrysanthemum
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,216 in granted patent volume.
- Cequent Performance Products, Inc. #11,212 · 27 patents
- Charm Sciences, Inc. #11,213 · 27 patents
- China Wafer Level CSP Co., Ltd. #11,214 · 27 patents
- Chromatic Inc. #11,215 · 27 patents
- Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. #11,217 · 27 patents
- Clariant Corporation #11,218 · 27 patents
- Clarios Advanced Solutions GmbH #11,219 · 27 patents
- ClearMotion Acquisition I LLC #11,220 · 27 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Chrysanthemum, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (12 here).
Chrysanthemum's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
12 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 11.1% |
| 2016 | 11 | 40.7% |
| 2017 | 6 | 22.2% |
| 2018 | 7 | 25.9% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Chrysanthemum Breeders Association Research B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #11,211 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Chrysanthemum Breeders Association Research B.V. against Cequent Performance Products, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 12.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.