Where does Chrysal International B.V. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Chrysal International B.V. ranks #45,670 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Chrysal International B.V. hold?

Chrysal International B.V. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Chrysal International B.V.'s Innovation Score?

Chrysal International B.V. has an Innovation Score of 23.7 out of 100 (13th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Chrysal International B.V. focus on?

Chrysal International B.V.'s top technology area is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment) with 4 patents, ranking #120 of 709 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Chrysal International B.V.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Chrysal International B.V.'s recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Chrysal International B.V.'s patents?

Chrysal International B.V.'s patents average 11.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Chrysal International B.V. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Chrysal International B.V.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47G (Household OR Table Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Chrysal ranks #45,670 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#45,670
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 13th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.7/100): 11.8
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45670 · Foreign Corporation #45,670 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,670/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Christopher Boots Pty
CPC-NARROW A47G · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 23.7/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Christopher Boots Pty Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Chrysal’s 23.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (26%) Velocity 3.3 pts (14%) Breadth 7.1 pts (30%) Claim depth 7.1 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Chrysal Internationa… · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Chrysal's Innovation Score is 23.7/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chrysal?

Each dot is one of Chrysal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chrysal’s own 11.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Chrysal vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Chrysal's grants concentrate

Chrysal International B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A47G (Household OR Table Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Chrysal sits between Christopher Boots Pty Ltd and Chun Lam Group (International) Limited.

Chrysal's three-year grant acceleration

Chrysal International B.V. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Christopher Boots…

5
Chrome Cherry

5
Chrome Red

5
Chronicled

5
Chrysalis Pharma

5
Chugai Pharmaceut…

5
Chukoh Chemical I…

5
Chun Lam Group (I…

5
Chrysal Internati… ◀

5

What this shows Chrysal holds 5 patents at rank #45,842, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Chrysal

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,842 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47G (Household OR Table Equipment)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Chrysal's primary technology class.

Chrysal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Chrysal International B.V. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2021	2	40.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Chrysal International B.V. patent most?

A47G - Household OR Table Equipment 4

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 4

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 3

A01N - Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Chrysal International B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Chrysal International B.V.'s lead technology class is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47G
Ranked #45,670 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Chrysal International B.V. against Christopher Boots Pty Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 23.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.