CFT S.P.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, CFT ranks #45,580 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #45,580
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 47%
- by Innovation Score (36.3/100)
- 7.6
- avg claims per patent
- +200%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45580 · Foreign Corporation #45,580 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,580/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cesca Therapeutics
- CPC-FOCUS A23L · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +200% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cesca Therapeutics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How CFT’s 36.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around CFT
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- CFT S P A · this assignee
CFT S P A · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows CFT's Innovation Score is 36.3/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for CFT?
Each dot is one of CFT’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CFT’s own 7.6 claims/patent is at or below the 17.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where CFT's grants concentrate
CFT S.P.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof). By volume, CFT sits between Cesca Therapeutics, Inc. and Chacha Search, Inc..
CFT's three-year grant acceleration
CFT S.P.A. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at CFT's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cesca Therapeutics
Cesca Therapeutics, Inc.
5 patents
- Cesium AB
Cesium AB
5 patents
- Ceva Animal Health
Ceva Animal Health Inc.
5 patents
- CFS Brands
CFS Brands, LLC
5 patents
- CG Oncology
CG Oncology, Inc.
5 patents
- Cgtech
CGTech
5 patents
- Cgenetech (Suzhou…
CGeneTech (Suzhou, China) Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Chacha Search
Chacha Search, Inc.
5 patents
- CFT S P A ◀
CFT S.P.A.
5 patents
What this shows CFT holds 5 patents at rank #45,492, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CFT
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,492 in granted patent volume.
- Cesca Therapeutics, Inc. #45,488 · 5 patents
- Cesium AB #45,489 · 5 patents
- Ceva Animal Health Inc. #45,490 · 5 patents
- CFS Brands, LLC #45,491 · 5 patents
- CG Oncology, Inc. #45,493 · 5 patents
- CGTech #45,494 · 5 patents
- CGeneTech (Suzhou, China) Co., Ltd. #45,495 · 5 patents
- Chacha Search, Inc. #45,496 · 5 patents
Leaders in A23L (Foods)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CFT's primary technology class.
CFT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does CFT S.P.A. patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
CFT S.P.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- CFT S.P.A.'s lead technology class is A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23L
- Ranked #45,580 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare CFT S.P.A. against Cesca Therapeutics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.