Overall rank by patents
#39,536
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS).
The verdict
Certus holds 6 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #39,536 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Certus Technologies has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Certus Technologies at rank #39,536 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS). As a Foreign Corporation, Certus Technologies is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Certus sits between Cerasina Gmbh (6 patents, rank #39,532) and Charis & Doxa, Inc. (6 patents, rank #39,540) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Certus Technologies's 17.7 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Certus Technologies against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Cerasina GmbH
6 patents
Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc.
6 patents
Ceres Technologies, Inc.
6 patents
Cern Corporation
6 patents
Changchun University of Science and Technology
6 patents
Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute
6 patents
Changzhou Huada Kejie Opto-Electro Instrument Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Charis & Doxa, Inc.
6 patents
Certus Technologies
6 patents
What this shows Certus holds 6 patents at rank #39,536, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,536 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Certus's primary technology class.
Certus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 82% higher than 18% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,536
Across all tracked assignees
25.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Certus's 6 grants land it in the top 82% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.