Cciip LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cciip ranks #13,908 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #13,908
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 38%
- by Innovation Score (39.5/100)
- 19.5
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13908 · US Corporation #13,908 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #13,908/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Bretford Manufacturing
- CPC-FOCUS E02F · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cciip’s 39.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cciip
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cciip · this assignee
Cciip · this assignee
40 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cciip's Innovation Score is 39.5/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cciip?
Each dot is one of Cciip’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cciip’s own 19.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cciip's grants concentrate
Cciip LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (8 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Cciip sits between Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. and CG BIO Co., Ltd..
Cciip's three-year grant acceleration
Cciip LLC shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cciip's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Bretford Manufact…
Bretford Manufacturing, Inc.
21 patents
- Butler Home Produ…
Butler Home Products
21 patents
- Carlisle Construc…
Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC
21 patents
- CCC Information S…
CCC Information Services Inc.
21 patents
- Celanese Acetate
Celanese Acetate LLC
21 patents
- Celeno Communicat…
Celeno Communications (ISRAEL) Ltd.
21 patents
- Centaur Technology
Centaur Technology, Inc.
21 patents
- CG BIO
CG BIO Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Cciip ◀
Cciip LLC
21 patents
What this shows Cciip holds 21 patents at rank #13,902, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cciip
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,902 in granted patent volume.
- Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. #13,898 · 21 patents
- Butler Home Products #13,899 · 21 patents
- Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC #13,900 · 21 patents
- CCC Information Services Inc. #13,901 · 21 patents
- Celanese Acetate LLC #13,903 · 21 patents
- Celeno Communications (ISRAEL) Ltd. #13,904 · 21 patents
- Centaur Technology, Inc. #13,905 · 21 patents
- CG BIO Co., Ltd. #13,906 · 21 patents
Leaders in E02F (Dredging)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cciip's primary technology class.
- Caterpillar Inc. 1,041 in class
- Komatsu Ltd. 910 in class
- Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 595 in class
- Deere & Company 487 in class
- Kubota Corporation 320 in class
- Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd 250 in class
- Volvo Construction Equipment AB 198 in class
- CNH Industrial America LLC 178 in class
Cciip's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 38% higher than 62% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 8 | 38.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2022 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2023 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 9.5% |
Which technologies does Cciip LLC patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cciip LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cciip LLC's lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
- Ranked #13,908 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cciip LLC against Bretford Manufacturing, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.