CAS Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01G (Weighing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, CAS ranks #45,489 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #45,489
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.0/100)
- 5.8
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45489 · Foreign Corporation #45,489 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,489/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Carnegie Robotics
- CPC-NARROW G01G · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.0/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2022 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Carnegie Robotics, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How CAS’s 20.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around CAS
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- CAS · this assignee 20
CAS · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows CAS's Innovation Score is 20.0/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for CAS?
Each dot is one of CAS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CAS’s own 5.8 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where CAS's grants concentrate
CAS Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under G01G (Weighing). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, CAS sits between Carnegie Robotics, LLC and Catalyst Orthopaedics LLC.
CAS's three-year grant acceleration
CAS Corporation shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at CAS's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Carnegie Robotics
Carnegie Robotics, LLC
5 patents
- Carpe Diem
Carpe Diem Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Carraro S P A
Carraro S.P.A.
5 patents
- CARS COM
CARS.COM, LLC
5 patents
- Case Western Univ…
Case Western University
5 patents
- Castle Island IP…
Castle Island IP Holding LLC
5 patents
- Catalent Pharma S…
Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC
5 patents
- Catalyst Orthopae…
Catalyst Orthopaedics LLC
5 patents
- CAS ◀
CAS Corporation
5 patents
What this shows CAS holds 5 patents at rank #45,453, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CAS
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,453 in granted patent volume.
- Carnegie Robotics, LLC #45,449 · 5 patents
- Carpe Diem Technologies, Inc. #45,450 · 5 patents
- Carraro S.P.A. #45,451 · 5 patents
- CARS.COM, LLC #45,452 · 5 patents
- Case Western University #45,454 · 5 patents
- Castle Island IP Holding LLC #45,455 · 5 patents
- Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC #45,456 · 5 patents
- Catalyst Orthopaedics LLC #45,457 · 5 patents
Leaders in G01G (Weighing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CAS's primary technology class.
- Ishida Co., Ltd. 72 in class
- Mettler-Toledo GmbH 57 in class
- Yamato Scale Co., Ltd. 39 in class
- A&D Company, Limited 30 in class
- Sartorius LAB Instruments GMBH & Co. KG 29 in class
- Bizerba SE & Co. KG 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo (Changzhou) Precision Instruments Ltd. 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 28 in class
CAS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does CAS Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
CAS Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- CAS Corporation's lead technology class is G01G (Weighing), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01G
- Ranked #45,489 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare CAS Corporation against Carnegie Robotics, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.