Overall rank by patents
#22,333
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cambridge ranks #22,333 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 15 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22333 · Foreign Corporation #22,333 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: C. Cretors & Company (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Cambridge Consultants · this assignee
37 score
Cedes · near
37 score
Diebold · near
37 score
OPKO Ireland Global… · near
37 score
Virnetx · near
37 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cambridge's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Cambridge Consultants Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Cambridge sits between C-motive Technologies, Inc. and Caremed Supply Inc..
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
C-MOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
12 patents
C. Cretors & Company
12 patents
CA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
12 patents
CALZONI S.R.L.
12 patents
CANNY SYSTEMS, LLC
12 patents
CARBONXT, INC.
12 patents
CARDIAC SUCCESS LTD.
12 patents
CAREMED SUPPLY INC.
12 patents
CAMBRIDGE CONSULTANTS LIMITED
12 patents
What this shows Cambridge holds 12 patents at rank #22,331, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,331 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambridge's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Cambridge, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (37 here).
Cambridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 5 | 41.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 8.3% |
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#22,333
of 50,000 tracked assignees
37.4 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.