Where does Caesarstone Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Caesarstone Ltd. ranks #25,939 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Caesarstone Ltd. hold?

Caesarstone Ltd. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Caesarstone Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Caesarstone Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 30.2 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Caesarstone Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Caesarstone Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Caesarstone Ltd.'s patents?

Caesarstone Ltd.'s patents average 5.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Caesarstone Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Caesarstone Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Caesarstone Ltd. focus on?

Caesarstone Ltd.'s top technology area is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone) with 3 patents, ranking #387 of 1,052 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Caesarstone ranks #25,939 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 8 technology areas.

#25,939
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.2/100): 5.9
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25939 · Foreign Corporation #25,939 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #25,939/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Bundesrepublik…
CPC-NARROW C04B · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch den Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Energie, dieser (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Caesarstone’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (28%) Velocity 8.3 pts (28%) Breadth 10.0 pts (33%) Claim depth 3.5 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Caesarstone · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Caesarstone's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Caesarstone?

Each dot is one of Caesarstone’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Caesarstone’s own 5.9 claims/patent is at or below the 15.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Caesarstone vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Caesarstone's grants concentrate

Caesarstone Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 30% of grants classified under C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Caesarstone sits between Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch den Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Energie, dieser and Capnia, Inc..

Caesarstone's three-year grant acceleration

Caesarstone Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Bundesrepublik De…

10
Business Partners

10
C D L Electric

10
C G Bretting Manu…

10
Calyxo

10
Canadian Bank Note

10
Canon Marketing J…

10
Capnia

10
Caesarstone ◀

10

What this shows Caesarstone holds 10 patents at rank #25,939, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Caesarstone

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,939 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C04B (Lime)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Caesarstone's primary technology class.

Caesarstone's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Caesarstone Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	10.0%
2019	4	40.0%
2022	1	10.0%
2023	2	20.0%
2024	2	20.0%

Which technologies does Caesarstone Ltd. patent most?

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 3

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 2

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 2

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 2

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

E03C - Domestic Plumbing Installations FOR Fresh Water OR Waste Water ; Sinks 1

B25B - Tools OR Bench Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, FOR Fastening, Connecting, Disengaging OR Holding 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Caesarstone Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Caesarstone Ltd.'s lead technology class is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone), 30% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C04B
Ranked #25,939 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Caesarstone Ltd. against Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch den Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Energie, dieser, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.