Overall rank by patents
#25,935
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23V (INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Bunge ranks #25,935 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 11 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R25935 · Foreign Corporation #25,935 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Badge Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Arizona Board Of Reg… · near
47 score
Blue Evolution · near
47 score
Bunge Loders Croklaa… · this assignee
47 score
Inrix · near
47 score
Kosmek · near
47 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Bunge's Innovation Score is 47.0/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Bunge Loders Croklaan B.v. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A23V (INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Bunge sits between Brugg ROHR Ag Holding and Battle Sight Technologies, Llc.
Bunge Loders Croklaan B.v. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
BRUGG ROHR AG HOLDING
10 patents
BRiLLiO LLC
10 patents
BTU RESEARCH LLC
10 patents
BUILDING CREATIVE KIDS, LLC
10 patents
BURKERT S.A.S.
10 patents
Badge Inc.
10 patents
Baidu International Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
10 patents
Battle Sight Technologies, LLC
10 patents
BUNGE LODERS CROKLAAN B.V.
10 patents
What this shows Bunge holds 10 patents at rank #25,882, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,882 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bunge's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Bunge, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (47 here).
Bunge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 30.0% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,935
of 50,000 tracked assignees
47.0 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.