Where does Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. ranks #39,055 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. hold?

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 1 technology areas.

What is Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 33.8 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd..

What does claim depth mean for Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s patents average 5.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. focus on?

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 2 patents, ranking #532 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 1 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Beijing ranks #39,055 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.

#39,055
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.8/100): 5.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39055 · Foreign Corporation #39,055 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,055/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Beijing Aeonmed
CPC-NARROW A63B · 1 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Beijing Aeonmed Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Beijing’s 33.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (59%) Breadth 3.5 pts (10%) Claim depth 3.5 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Beijing Kingsmith… · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Beijing's Innovation Score is 33.8/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Beijing?

Each dot is one of Beijing’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Beijing’s own 5.8 claims/patent is at or below the 11.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Beijing vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Beijing's grants concentrate

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). By volume, Beijing sits between Beijing Aeonmed Co., Ltd. and Beijing QL Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd..

Beijing's three-year grant acceleration

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Beijing Aeonmed

6
Beijing Antvr Tec…

6
Beijing Choice Te…

6
Beijing Irtouch S…

6
Beijing Mabridge…

6
Beijing Naton Med…

6
Beijing Qingying…

6
Beijing QL Biopha…

6
Beijing Kingsmith… ◀

6

What this shows Beijing holds 6 patents at rank #39,041, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Beijing

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,041 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Beijing's primary technology class.

Beijing's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	2	33.3%
2024	2	33.3%
2025partial year	2	33.3%

Which technologies does Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 2

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #39,055 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Beijing Kingsmith Technology Co., Ltd. against Beijing Aeonmed Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.