BDR Thermea Group B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F23D (Burners).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, BDR ranks #45,065 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #45,065
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 19th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.0/100)
- 10.0
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45065 · Foreign Corporation #45,065 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,065/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Bauer Deep Drilling
- CPC-NARROW F23D · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.0/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Bauer Deep Drilling GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How BDR’s 26.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around BDR
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- BDR Thermea Group B V · this assignee 26
BDR Thermea Group B V · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows BDR's Innovation Score is 26.0/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for BDR?
Each dot is one of BDR’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). BDR’s own 10.0 claims/patent is at or below the 11.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where BDR's grants concentrate
BDR Thermea Group B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under F23D (Burners). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, BDR sits between Bauer Deep Drilling GmbH and Beatport, LLC.
BDR's three-year grant acceleration
BDR Thermea Group B.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at BDR's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Bauer Deep Drilli…
Bauer Deep Drilling GmbH
5 patents
- Bazzica Engineeri…
Bazzica Engineering S.RL.
5 patents
- BBS Motorsport
BBS Motorsport GMBH
5 patents
- BCM
BCM Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- BEA
BEA Inc.
5 patents
- Beaba
BEABA
5 patents
- Beammwave AB
Beammwave AB
5 patents
- Beatport
Beatport, LLC
5 patents
- BDR Thermea Group… ◀
BDR Thermea Group B.V.
5 patents
What this shows BDR holds 5 patents at rank #45,052, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near BDR
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,052 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F23D (Burners)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in BDR's primary technology class.
- Delavan Inc. 62 in class
- Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. 54 in class
- Clearsign Combustion Corporation 48 in class
- Rinnai Corporation 45 in class
- Pro-iroda Industries, Inc. 43 in class
- Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd. 35 in class
- Lennox Industries Inc. 35 in class
- EBERSPÄCHER Climate Control Systems GMBH 29 in class
BDR's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does BDR Thermea Group B.V. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
BDR Thermea Group B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- BDR Thermea Group B.V.'s lead technology class is F23D (Burners), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F23D
- Ranked #45,065 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare BDR Thermea Group B.V. against Bauer Deep Drilling GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.