USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE).

27
Total patents granted
26
CPC technology areas
18.0
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year grant velocity

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Bausch ranks #11,178 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 26 technology areas.

#11,178
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 3%
by Innovation Score (60.3/100)
18.0
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited has been granted 27 US utility patents between 2023 and 2025, placing Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited at #11,178 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 26 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE). As a Foreign Corporation, Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Bausch sits between Bonutti Research, Inc. (27 patents, rank #11,182) and Black Diamond Oilfield Rentals Llc (27 patents, rank #11,190) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 60.3/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2023 through 2025, with 27 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.

Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's 18.0 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 26 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.

Who files at Bausch's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Bausch holds 27 patents at rank #11,186, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Bausch

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,186 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable INTO Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bausch's primary technology class.

Bausch's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

60 Top 3% higher than 97% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Below this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

2468101214 202320242025 12
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2023–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2023 3 11.1%
2024 12 44.4%
2025partial year 12 44.4%

Which technologies does Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited patent most?

Top 15 of 26 technology areas

Grant record at a glance

Portfolio Volume 27 grants
CPC subclasses 26
Avg. claims / grant 18.0

Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#11,178

of 50,000 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

60.3 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited rank among US patent assignees?
According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited ranks #11,178 of 50,000 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.
How many patents does Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited hold?
Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2023 and 2025, spanning 26 technology areas.
What is Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's Innovation Score?
Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited has an Innovation Score of 60.3 out of 100 (top 3% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited focus on?
Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's top technology area is A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRS) with 12 patents. Grants appear in 26 CPC subclasses total.
Is Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited.
What does claim depth mean for Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's patents?
Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited's patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.
How is the Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Bausch's 27 grants land it in the top 3% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Bausch ranks #11,178 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61F - see who else leads that technology area. A61F leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.