Overall rank by patents
#38,947
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, active 2015–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION).
The verdict
Ascension holds 6 US patents across 3 technology areas, rank #38,947 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2017, placing Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. at rank #38,947 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 3 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION). As a US Corporation, Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Ascension sits between Arzel Zoning Technology, Inc. (6 patents, rank #38,943) and Asia University (6 patents, rank #38,951) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 24.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Ascension Orthopedics, Inc.'s 18.7 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 3 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Arzel Zoning Technology, Inc.
6 patents
Asahi Kasei Battery Separator Corporation
6 patents
Asahi Kasei Bioprocess America, Inc.
6 patents
Asano Laboratories Co., Ltd.
6 patents
Ascent Products, LLC
6 patents
Ascent Solutions Pte Ltd
6 patents
Asco Industries NV
6 patents
Asia University
6 patents
Ascension Orthopedics, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Ascension holds 6 patents at rank #38,947, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,947 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ascension's primary technology class.
Ascension's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 Top 86% higher than 14% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#38,947
Across all tracked assignees
24.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Ascension's 6 grants land it in the top 86% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.