Overall rank by patents
#8,159
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 39 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60C (VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Apollo ranks #8,159 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 39 patents across 19 technology areas.
Apollo Tyres Global R&D B.v. has been granted 39 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Apollo Tyres Global R&D B.v. at #8,159 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 19 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 5.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60C (VEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES). As a Foreign Corporation, Apollo Tyres Global R&D B.v. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Apollo sits between Air Liquide Advanced Technologies U.s. Llc (39 patents, rank #8,159) and Backbeat Medical, Llc (39 patents, rank #8,167) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.1/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 28 grants, compared with 7 in the 2015–2019 window, a +300% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Apollo Tyres Global R&D B.v.'s 5.7 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 19 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Air Liquide Advanced Technologies U.S. LLC
39 patents
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
39 patents
American Science and Engineering, Inc.
39 patents
Apeel Technology, Inc.
39 patents
Arisaka LLC
39 patents
AvicenaTech, Corp.
39 patents
Axogen Corporation
39 patents
BackBeat Medical, LLC
39 patents
Apollo Tyres Global R&D B.V.
39 patents
What this shows Apollo holds 39 patents at rank #8,163, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #8,163 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Apollo's primary technology class.
Apollo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 2.6% |
| 2017 | 2 | 5.1% |
| 2018 | 2 | 5.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 5.1% |
| 2020 | 7 | 17.9% |
| 2021 | 2 | 5.1% |
| 2022 | 7 | 17.9% |
| 2023 | 11 | 28.2% |
| 2024 | 1 | 2.6% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 10.3% |
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#8,159
of 50,000 tracked assignees
43.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Apollo's 39 grants land it in the top 29% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.