USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Apart ranks #44,763 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.

#44,763
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (13.5/100)
3.8
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44763 · Foreign Corporation #44,763 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • LOWER-Q #44,763/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Aoti
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 13.5/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Aoti, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Apart’s 13.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Apart

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Apart's Innovation Score is 13.5/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Apart?

Each dot is one of Apart’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Apart’s own 3.8 claims/patent is at or below the 10.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Apart vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Aoti, Inc. - 5, 14.4AotiAP Photonices (SHENZHEN) Limited - 5, 10.4AP Photonices (Sh…AP Precision Metals, Inc. - 5, 1AP Precision Meta…Apalta Patents OÜ - 5, 18.2Apalta Patents OÜApitope Technology (BRISTOL) Limited - 5, 6.6Apitope Technolog…Apium Inc. - 5, 17.8ApiumApollo Fire Detectors Limited - 5, 11.8Apollo Fire Detec…Applestone Meat Company LLC - 5, 1Applestone MeatApart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap - 5, 3.8Apart Audio Naaml…
Apart vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Apart's grants concentrate

Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2019. By volume, Apart sits between Aoti, Inc. and Applestone Meat Company LLC.

Who files at Apart's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Apart holds 5 patents at rank #44,579, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Apart

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,579 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Apart's primary technology class.

Apart's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.5 20182019 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 3 60.0%
2019 2 40.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #44,763 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Apart Audio, Naamloze Vennootschap against Aoti, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 13.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.