Airborne Motorworks Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Airborne ranks #38,656 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #38,656
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 30%
- by Innovation Score (42.6/100)
- 7.8
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R38656 · US Corporation #38,656 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #38,656/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Aidian Oy
- CPC-FOCUS H02K · 10 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.6/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2024 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Aidian Oy (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Airborne’s 42.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Airborne
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Airborne Motorworks · this assignee
Airborne Motorworks · this assignee
43 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Airborne's Innovation Score is 42.6/100 (top 30% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Airborne?
Each dot is one of Airborne’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Airborne’s own 7.8 claims/patent is at or below the 11.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Airborne's grants concentrate
Airborne Motorworks Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Airborne sits between Aidian Oy and Airtime Media, Inc..
Airborne's three-year grant acceleration
Airborne Motorworks Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Airborne's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Aidian Oy
Aidian Oy
6 patents
- Aion LED
Aion LED, Inc.
6 patents
- Air Black Box
Air Black Box Technologies LLC
6 patents
- Air Innovations
Air Innovations, Inc.
6 patents
- Airista Flow
Airista Flow, Inc.
6 patents
- Airscout
Airscout Inc.
6 patents
- Airtech Group
Airtech Group, Inc.
6 patents
- Airtime Media
Airtime Media, Inc.
6 patents
- Airborne Motorwor… ◀
Airborne Motorworks Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Airborne holds 6 patents at rank #38,827, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Airborne
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,827 in granted patent volume.
- Aidian Oy #38,823 · 6 patents
- Aion LED, Inc. #38,824 · 6 patents
- Air Black Box Technologies LLC #38,825 · 6 patents
- Air Innovations, Inc. #38,826 · 6 patents
- Airista Flow, Inc. #38,828 · 6 patents
- Airscout Inc. #38,829 · 6 patents
- Airtech Group, Inc. #38,830 · 6 patents
- Airtime Media, Inc. #38,831 · 6 patents
Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Airborne's primary technology class.
Airborne's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 30% higher than 70% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2023 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Airborne Motorworks Inc. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Airborne Motorworks Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Airborne Motorworks Inc.'s lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
- Ranked #38,656 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Airborne Motorworks Inc. against Aidian Oy, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.