Where does Airborne Athletics, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Airborne Athletics, Inc. ranks #13,844 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Airborne Athletics, Inc. hold?

Airborne Athletics, Inc. holds 21 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Airborne Athletics, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 36.0 out of 100 (top 48% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +86% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s patents?

Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s patents average 17.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Airborne Athletics, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Airborne Athletics, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Airborne Athletics, Inc. focus on?

Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 18 patents, ranking #63 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Airborne ranks #13,844 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 4 technology areas.

#13,844
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 48%
by Innovation Score (36.0/100): 17.8
avg claims per patent: +86%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13844 · US Corporation #13,844 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
MID-PACK #13,844/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Aduro BioTech
CPC-NARROW A63B · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +86% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Aduro BioTech Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Airborne’s 36.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.7 pts (30%) Velocity 7.6 pts (21%) Breadth 7.1 pts (20%) Claim depth 10.7 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Airborne Athletics · this assignee

36
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Airborne's Innovation Score is 36.0/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Airborne?

Each dot is one of Airborne’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Airborne’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Airborne vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Airborne's grants concentrate

Airborne Athletics, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Airborne sits between Aduro BioTech Inc. and Alpha Technologies Services LLC.

Airborne's three-year grant acceleration

Airborne Athletics, Inc. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Aduro Biotech

21
Advanced Fusion S…

21
Adverio Pharma

21
Air Squared

21
All Systems Broad…

21
Allurion

21
Almondnet

21
Alpha Services

21
Airborne Athletics ◀

21

What this shows Airborne holds 21 patents at rank #13,859, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Airborne

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,859 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Airborne's primary technology class.

Airborne's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Airborne Athletics, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	4.8%
2017	2	9.5%
2018	2	9.5%
2019	2	9.5%
2020	2	9.5%
2021	3	14.3%
2022	3	14.3%
2023	2	9.5%
2024	3	14.3%
2025partial year	1	4.8%

Which technologies does Airborne Athletics, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 18

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 2

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 2

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Airborne Athletics, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #13,844 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Airborne Athletics, Inc. against Aduro BioTech Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.